
For years, ad performance was something you discovered after launch. Creative went live, data came in, and only then did optimisation begin.
That model is breaking.
Today, AI can predict performance before a campaign runs by analysing how a creative is built. Not who it targets. Not where it runs. But from the creative itself.
Creative has historically been evaluated through intuition, taste, and experience. While valuable, these inputs were hard to scale and impossible to quantify consistently.
AI changes this by breaking creatives down into measurable attributes such as:
The result is a shift from opinion-based creative feedback to probability-based performance prediction.
Great campaigns start with great creatives. But for advertisers, it hasn’t always been easy to know what makes one ad perform better than another, especially before the campaign goes live.
That’s why Eskimi is changing the game with our Creative Attributes & Insights. This new AI-powered feature automatically analyzes every ad you upload, breaking it down into elements like logos, colors, visuals, and text to uncover what really drives performance.

When you upload a creative, our AI breaks it down into core elements:
1. Logos
2. Colors
3. Text
4. Visuals
5. And much more
From this analysis, the AI generates a detailed report that helps you understand what's working, what needs improvement, and how to optimize.
Every creative receives an overall score that measures its effectiveness against industry benchmarks, so you know exactly where you stand.
It calculates it based on visual clarity, branding strength, message effectiveness, call-to-action, and urgency & engagement in the creative.
So how does this “prediction” correlate with real-world results?
We set out to find out!
Using Eskimi’s Creative Attributes & Insights scoring model, Creatives were grouped into three score brackets and evaluated against real delivery data on engagement rate.
The dataset includes over 1.25 billion impressions across 9,405 creatives. At this scale, random fluctuation becomes statistically negligible.

With sample sizes in the hundreds of millions of impressions per group, the results exceed a 99.9% confidence level. High volume creatives influence results proportionally
To avoid bias from small, high performing creatives, engagement was calculated using impression weighted averages.
And now, it is predictable.
Score 1-3: Average Engagement 3.68%
Score 4-6: Average Engagement: 5.25%
Score 7-9: Average Engagement 7.52%

Most optimisation today still happens downstream:
Creative analysis flips this logic upstream.
If AI can predict which creatives are statistically more likely to perform, teams can:
Instead of asking “Which creative won?” after launch, teams can ask
“Which creative is most likely to win?” before launch.
The industry has already accepted algorithmic optimisation in bidding and targeting. Creative has lagged behind because it was difficult to measure.
That gap is closing.
AI models now understand how humans visually process ads. They can estimate attention, predict engagement, and highlight structural weaknesses long before media spend is committed.
Eskimi’s creative attributes model shows that when creative fundamentals are strong, performance follows consistently.
Different models. Same outcome.
The next competitive edge in advertising will not come from buying media better. That advantage is shrinking as platforms automate.
It will come from designing better creative earlier.
Teams that integrate AI driven creative analysis into their workflow will:
Creative is no longer just art or instinct. It is data, probability, and performance.